While NBFIs help broaden accesThe Rise of Non-Bank Financial Institutions in AML Risks to essential financial services, particularly for underbanked or underserved populations, they also introduce unique AML challenges. These entities often operate with lighter regulatory oversight compared to traditional banks, which creates gaps in financial supervision and opens doors for illicit activity. Understanding and mitigating AML risk in the expanding landscape of non-bank financial services is essential to global financial stability.

The Evolution of Financial Services

The digitization of the financial sector has led to an explosion of alternative financial platforms. Fintech startups offer rapid onboarding, mobile-first transactions, and lower fees, making them attractive alternatives to traditional banking. Crypto exchanges, neobanks, peer-to-peer lending platforms, and e-money institutions now handle billions in daily financial transactions globally.

However, this shift has brought about a reconfiguration of AML risk profiles. Many of these non-bank financial institutions do not fall squarely under the same regulatory regimes as banks. This uneven application of AML rules has led to what some experts term the “AML blind spot,” where illicit actors exploit system vulnerabilities to move, layer, and obscure financial transactions.

AML Risk Exposure in Non-Bank Institutions

AML risk in non-bank financial institutions arises primarily from four dimensions:

1. Regulatory Arbitrage: NBFIs may be licensed under jurisdictions with weak or non-existent AML enforcement. Criminals exploit these regulatory havens to route transactions beyond the visibility of robust financial authorities.
   
2. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Gaps: Many non-bank financial entities lack adequate Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, increasing the risk of onboarding shell companies, mules, or bad actors.
   
3. High Volume and Speed of Transactions: Fintech platforms often prioritize user convenience and speed, facilitating real-time transfers. This feature, while beneficial, increases the risk of rapid money laundering schemes that traditional AML monitoring systems may miss.
   
4. Crypto Integration: With blockchain-based financial services on the rise, many non-bank platforms now offer crypto services. Without blockchain analytics tools, these entities face significant AML risks tied to pseudonymous transactions and decentralized finance.

Regulatory Developments and AML Obligations

Recognizing the growing risk posed by NBFIs, regulators worldwide are extending AML obligations to these financial actors. FATF’s Recommendation 15, revised in 2019, emphasized that virtual asset service providers (VASPs), a key subset of NBFIs, must adhere to the same AML standards as traditional financial institutions.

In the European Union, the Sixth AML Directive (6AMLD) and the proposed Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA) highlight the need for consistent application of AML risk-based approaches across all financial entities, including non-banks. The U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has similarly issued guidance requiring MSBs and digital currency platforms to implement robust AML programs and file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).

Despite these measures, many non-bank institutions struggle with implementation due to a lack of infrastructure, expertise, or financial incentive to comply fully.

Real-World Examples of AML Failures

Several high-profile AML failures have spotlighted the growing risk associated with non-bank financial institutions:

• Wirecard, a German payment processor, collapsed in 2020 amid massive accounting fraud and allegations of enabling suspicious financial flows across multiple jurisdictions.
  
• Crypto exchanges, such as BTC-e and Bitzlato, have faced enforcement actions for facilitating illicit transfers, money laundering, and failing to verify customer identities.
  
• Remittance services, particularly in emerging markets, have been exploited for laundering proceeds from drug trafficking and terrorism financing, exposing critical weaknesses in AML compliance.
  

Each case highlights the urgent need to embed AML risk frameworks deeply within all financial infrastructures.

Tools for Managing AML Risk in NBFIs

To address the evolving AML landscape, non-bank financial institutions must adopt advanced risk management tools. These include:

• AI-driven transaction monitoring systems to detect suspicious behavior across massive data volumes in real time.
  
• Blockchain analytics tools (e.g., Chainalysis, CipherTrace) that trace crypto asset movements and flag high-risk wallets and transactions.
  
• Enhanced due diligence (EDD) protocols for high-risk clients or geographies, ensuring additional scrutiny and documentation.
  
• Risk-based AML training programs for compliance staff, tailored to the specific financial services offered by the institution.
  

Implementing such solutions allows non-bank entities to stay ahead of evolving risk typologies and regulatory expectations.

The Role of Collaboration

One of the most effective strategies for addressing AML risk in the non-bank sector is fostering collaboration. Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs), regulators, and private sector actors must coordinate to share data, typologies, and red flags.

Public-private partnerships, such as the UK’s Joint Money Laundering Intelligence Taskforce (JMLIT) or the U.S. FinCEN Exchange, demonstrates how real-time intelligence sharing can mitigate AML threats across the entire financial system, including non-bank participants.

Moreover, self-regulatory organizations and industry bodies can develop compliance best practices, issue certifications, and conduct regular audits to improve AML maturity across non-bank sectors.

As conclusion

The rise of non-bank financial institutions has transformed how people access and use financial services globally. However, this evolution also introduces complex AML risk vectors that require urgent attention.

A proactive, technology-driven, and collaborative approach to AML compliance is essential to securing the integrity of the broader financial ecosystem. As these institutions continue to gain financial ground, regulators, businesses, and technology providers must ensure that AML risk management grows in tandem with innovation.

Non-bank financial institutions are not exempt from responsibility, they are at the front line of risk and opportunity in today’s AML fight. Strengthening compliance now will define whether they can build a secure, resilient future in the global financial landscape.

Our contacts

If you want to become our client or partner, feel free to contact us at support@manimama.eu.

Or use our telegram @manimama_sales and we will respond to your inquiry.

We also invite you to visit our website: https://manimama.eu/.

Join our Telegram to receive news in a convenient way: Manimama Legal Channel.

---

Manimama Law Firm provides a gateway for the companies operating as the virtual asset wallet and exchange providers allowing to enter to the markets legally. We are ready to offer an appropriate support in obtaining a license with lower founding and operating costs. We offer KYC/AML launch, support in risk assessment, legal services, legal opinions, advice on general data protection provisions, contracts and all necessary legal and business tools to start business of virtual asset service provider.

---

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter, not to be considered as a legal consultation.